[CALUG] (solved) konqueror is funny

Walt Smith waltechmail at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 5 18:43:07 EST 2011


Hi all,

First, Bonnie has been helpful with taking a look at
the actual code and trying alternatives.

All who replied offered constructive information.

Second,  the "bad" code is available as:
http://waltech.freeshell.org/index.html.txt         and
http://waltech.freeshell.org/index.html.txt.html

The first will (should) obviously simply show the html code itself
as plain text since it's a "text" file: I think this depends on the 
browser used and user settings.  It works that way on my FF.

The second link would crash some konqueror's.

Third:
Konqueror => View has a setting for khtml or webkit.
It crashes in either setting.

Fourth: when recieving a text file, suffix .txt, my browser
has an interesting  habit of adding a 2nd "Bookmark" on the
top menu... one is plural and the other isn't !! It goes away
when I get a suffixed .html file.

Fifth: I went to the w3c link and observed the errors.


Thanks!!!!


Walt.........


--- On Sat, 2/5/11, calug-request at unknownlamer.org <calug-request at unknownlamer.org> wrote:

> From: calug-request at unknownlamer.org <calug-request at unknownlamer.org>
> Subject: CALUG Digest, Vol 50, Issue 5
> To: calug at unknownlamer.org
> Date: Saturday, February 5, 2011, 5:30 PM
> Send CALUG mailing list submissions
> to
>     calug at unknownlamer.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>     http://lists.unknownlamer.org/listinfo/calug
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
> to
>     calug-request at unknownlamer.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>     calug-owner at unknownlamer.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> specific
> than "Re: Contents of CALUG digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: (solved) konqueror is funny
> (crash) (Walt Smith)
>    2. Re: (solved) konqueror is funny
> (crash) (Ken Jackson)
>    3. Re: (solved) konqueror is funny
> (crash) (Bonnie Dalzell)
>    4. Re: (solved) konqueror is funny
> (crash) (Bonnie Dalzell)
>    5. Re: (solved) konqueror is funny
> (crash) (Schmertz, Robert)
>    6. Browser acid test scores (Ken
> Jackson)
>    7. Re: Browser acid test scores (Bonnie
> Dalzell)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 10:11:57 -0800 (PST)
> From: Walt Smith <waltechmail at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [CALUG] (solved) konqueror is funny (crash)
> To: "calug at unknownlamer.org"
> <calug at unknownlamer.org>
> Message-ID: <21474.16294.qm at web120010.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks all who answered.  And those who confirmed the
> problem.
> I deleted the offending lines of code pointed out by Rajiv
> and konqueror works on that site.  One error message
> in some status 
> bar indicated "source" something something, and I had
> wrongly assumed
> the site wasn't being reached.  I never would have
> suspected
> the html code itself would have crashed the browser. 
> This morning,
> I realized one troubleshoot method would have been to
> tcpdump
> the request to see that it was properly leaving my box.
> 
> historical note:
> the web page was done by hand well over 10 years ago,
> probably 
> closer to 1996.  At one point, I had called it into
> the (very old) 
> Mozilla composer and then exited just to see how much
> additional crap
> would be inserted... and I got rid of "most" of the added
> crap.
> Again, that was well over 10 years ago.
> Since then, I've done minor edits.
> 
> Only once in the past has one browser not loaded the page,
> and it didn't crash.  I still don't think konqueror
> should die
> horribly. I routinely use the distros FF 3.5 to do most
> browsing.
> And only recently decided to take another look at
> konqueror.
> 
> I've not aspired to be a web page designer.
> And I admit that all the &nbsp's are mine.
> 
> I would be interested in a solution to cleaning up the
> page.
> I don't know what attributes or composer I could use to
> achieve 
> the same "look" result.  What is available in the F12
> distro ?
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Walt........
> 
> 
> --- On Sat, 2/5/11, Rajiv Gunja <opn.src.rocks at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> From: Rajiv Gunja <opn.src.rocks at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [CALUG] konqueror is funny (crash)
> To: jfitz at computer.org
> Cc: "calug at unknownlamer.org"
> <calug at unknownlamer.org>,
> waltechmail at yahoo.com
> Date: Saturday, February 5, 2011, 11:36 AM
> 
> Looking at the code, it is faulty.
> 
> 01. The programmer intended to comment lines 70,71 and 72,
> but failed to do so. Instead, he/she commented out the
> entire code from line 70 to the end.
> 
> 
> Once I commented out those 3 lines (line 70a) <!-- and
> ending with --> (line 72b), the page loaded without
> issues.
> 
> 70a <!-- 
> 70b <!--P>
> 71? <!--B><!--A HREF="http://www.bcpl.net/help/">BCPL Tech Support
> Pages</A></B>
> 
> 
> 72a <!--p>
> 72b -->
> 
> 02. The programmer is trying to use HTML 4.0, but is not
> following any of its standards. The code starts off with
> Windows HTML editor and has too many of the "&nbsp;",
> which is really bad way to get the text to move to its
> place.
> 
> 
> 
> I recently started writing html/php/JS/ajax code and I know
> how tempting it is to use a WYSIWYG editor, but we end up
> getting so much more junk than we intended. 
> 
> Yes, writing CSS or using "tables" is more work for a
> simple text page, but the results are standard and works
> well on all browsers. (except IE, which seems to have its
> own mind).
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Rajiv G Gunja
> 
> 
> Blog: http://ossrocks.blogspot.com
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 22:33, John Fitzpatrick <jfitz2nyc at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> I get the same result with Konqueror on Kubuntu 10.10. When
> going to http://waltech.freeshell.org, Konqueror
> crashes. (Rather quickly, too.)
> 
> 
> 
> "Per aspera ad astra"
> 
> John Fitzpatrick
> 
> jfitz at computer.org
> 
> 410-385-2461
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Fri, 2/4/11, Walt Smith <waltechmail at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > OS is Fedora 12, gnome desktop i686
> 
> > konqueror 4.4.5 is crashing totally and instantly
> 
> > with one known address.
> 
> >
> 
> > however, it *Crashes*? everytime I? do
> 
> > http://waltech.freeshell.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> CALUG mailing list
> 
> CALUG at unknownlamer.org
> 
> http://lists.unknownlamer.org/listinfo/calug
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:51:23 -0500
> From: Ken Jackson <linux at kenjackson.us>
> Subject: Re: [CALUG] (solved) konqueror is funny (crash)
> To: calug at unknownlamer.org
> Message-ID: <4D4DAA3B.5070307 at kenjackson.us>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> 
> The fact that a single malformed webpage can crash a
> browser
> is proof positive that that browser has a bug.
> 
> I didn't think of it till this morning--too late, but I was
> going to
> save that page and come up with as small of a page as I
> could that
> would crash Konqueror and put it on my own site to preserve
> it.
> Then I would post a bug report referencing it.
> 
> And what a bug report that would be!  Here, just visit
> this site
> and Konqueror immediately crashes.
> 
> But I briefly searched <https://bugs.kde.org/query.cgi>, and found
> that at least one other site has been reported already.
> Warning!  This crashes Konqueror: <http://www.webmail.us/testvirus>
> 
> It was reported in this bug report:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126636
> 
> -Ken
> 
> On 02/05/2011 01:11 PM, Walt Smith wrote:
> > Thanks all who answered.  And those who confirmed
> the problem.
> > I deleted the offending lines of code pointed out by
> Rajiv
> > and konqueror works on that site.  One error
> message in some status
> > bar indicated "source" something something, and I had
> wrongly assumed
> > the site wasn't being reached.  I never would
> have suspected
> > the html code itself would have crashed the browser.
> ...
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:57:28 -0500 (EST)
> From: Bonnie Dalzell <bdalzell at qis.net>
> Subject: Re: [CALUG] (solved) konqueror is funny (crash)
> To: Walt Smith <waltechmail at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "calug at unknownlamer.org"
> <calug at unknownlamer.org>
> Message-ID:
>     <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102051455170.1932 at localhost6.localdomain6>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2011, Walt Smith wrote:
> 
> I can make it w3 complaint for you by hand if you want. It
> is a small 
> page would take me maybe 10 minutes following the analysis
> from W3C.
> 
> I have tutorials posted at http://BATW.net on simple html by hand if
> you 
> want to learn the basics of html to do pages in this sort
> of format.
> 
> >
> >
> > Thanks all who answered.  And those who confirmed
> the problem.
> > I deleted the offending lines of code pointed out by
> Rajiv
> > and konqueror works on that site.  One error
> message in some status
> > bar indicated "source" something something, and I had
> wrongly assumed
> > the site wasn't being reached.  I never would
> have suspected
> > the html code itself would have crashed the
> browser.  This morning,
> > I realized one troubleshoot method would have been to
> tcpdump
> > the request to see that it was properly leaving my
> box.
> >
> > historical note:
> > the web page was done by hand well over 10 years ago,
> probably
> > closer to 1996.  At one point, I had called it
> into the (very old)
> > Mozilla composer and then exited just to see how much
> additional crap
> > would be inserted... and I got rid of "most" of the
> added crap.
> > Again, that was well over 10 years ago.
> > Since then, I've done minor edits.
> >
> > Only once in the past has one browser not loaded the
> page,
> > and it didn't crash.  I still don't think
> konqueror should die
> > horribly. I routinely use the distros FF 3.5 to do
> most browsing.
> > And only recently decided to take another look at
> konqueror.
> >
> > I've not aspired to be a web page designer.
> > And I admit that all the &nbsp's are mine.
> >
> > I would be interested in a solution to cleaning up the
> page.
> > I don't know what attributes or composer I could use
> to achieve
> > the same "look" result.  What is available in the
> F12 distro ?
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Walt........
> >
> >
> > --- On Sat, 2/5/11, Rajiv Gunja <opn.src.rocks at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rajiv Gunja <opn.src.rocks at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [CALUG] konqueror is funny (crash)
> > To: jfitz at computer.org
> > Cc: "calug at unknownlamer.org"
> <calug at unknownlamer.org>,
> waltechmail at yahoo.com
> > Date: Saturday, February 5, 2011, 11:36 AM
> >
> > Looking at the code, it is faulty.
> >
> > 01. The programmer intended to comment lines 70,71 and
> 72, but failed to do so. Instead, he/she commented out the
> entire code from line 70 to the end.
> >
> >
> > Once I commented out those 3 lines (line 70a) <!--
> and ending with --> (line 72b), the page loaded without
> issues.
> >
> > 70a <!--
> > 70b <!--P>
> > 71? <!--B><!--A HREF="http://www.bcpl.net/help/">BCPL Tech Support
> Pages</A></B>
> >
> >
> > 72a <!--p>
> > 72b -->
> >
> > 02. The programmer is trying to use HTML 4.0, but is
> not following any of its standards. The code starts off with
> Windows HTML editor and has too many of the "&nbsp;",
> which is really bad way to get the text to move to its
> place.
> >
> >
> >
> > I recently started writing html/php/JS/ajax code and I
> know how tempting it is to use a WYSIWYG editor, but we end
> up getting so much more junk than we intended.
> >
> > Yes, writing CSS or using "tables" is more work for a
> simple text page, but the results are standard and works
> well on all browsers. (except IE, which seems to have its
> own mind).
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rajiv G Gunja
> >
> >
> > Blog: http://ossrocks.blogspot.com
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 22:33, John Fitzpatrick <jfitz2nyc at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I get the same result with Konqueror on Kubuntu 10.10.
> When going to http://waltech.freeshell.org, Konqueror
> crashes. (Rather quickly, too.)
> >
> >
> >
> > "Per aspera ad astra"
> >
> > John Fitzpatrick
> >
> > jfitz at computer.org
> >
> > 410-385-2461
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Fri, 2/4/11, Walt Smith <waltechmail at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> OS is Fedora 12, gnome desktop i686
> >
> >> konqueror 4.4.5 is crashing totally and instantly
> >
> >> with one known address.
> >
> >>
> >
> >> however, it *Crashes*? everytime I? do
> >
> >> http://waltech.freeshell.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > CALUG mailing list
> >
> > CALUG at unknownlamer.org
> >
> > http://lists.unknownlamer.org/listinfo/calug
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CALUG mailing list
> > CALUG at unknownlamer.org
> > http://lists.unknownlamer.org/listinfo/calug
> >
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>                
>         Bonnie Dalzell, MA
> mail:5100 Hydes Rd PO Box 60, Hydes,MD,USA
> 21082-0060|EMAIL:bdalzell at qis.net
> Freelance anatomist, vertebrate paleontologist, writer,
> illustrator, dog
> breeder, computer nerd & iconoclast... Borzoi info at
> www.borzois.com.
> HOME www.batw.net    ART
> bdalzellart.batw.net  BUSINESS www.boardingatwedge.com
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 16:11:50 -0500 (EST)
> From: Bonnie Dalzell <bdalzell at qis.net>
> Subject: Re: [CALUG] (solved) konqueror is funny (crash)
> To: Ken Jackson <linux at kenjackson.us>
> Cc: calug at unknownlamer.org
> Message-ID:
>     <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102051606100.1932 at localhost6.localdomain6>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> 
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2011, Ken Jackson wrote:
> 
> > The fact that a single malformed web page can crash a
> browser
> > is proof positive that that browser has a bug.
> >
> > I didn't think of it till this morning--too late, but
> I was going to
> > save that page and come up with as small of a page as
> I could that
> > would crash Konqueror and put it on my own site to
> preserve it.
> > Then I would post a bug report referencing it.
> >
> > And what a bug report that would be!  Here, just
> visit this site
> > and Konqueror immediately crashes.
> >
> > But I briefly searched <https://bugs.kde.org/query.cgi>, and found
> > that at least one other site has been reported
> already.
> > Warning!  This crashes Konqueror: <http://www.webmail.us/testvirus>
> >
> > It was reported in this bug report:
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126636
> >
> 
> According to wikipedia the engine used by konqueror KHTML
> has a fork - 
> webkit which is used in the Safari and Chrome browsers as
> well as the 
> current Epiphany browser. I can state that Epiphany 2.30.2
> is not crashed 
> by the Waltech page.
> 
> I use Epiphany often when I do not want to have the browser
> use resources 
> they way Firefox does. However there is/was a bug I have
> not been able 
> to properly characterize in Epiphany which will not only
> crash the 
> browser but freeze my whole system. It relates to selecting
> a graphic and 
> not being able to cancel the selection.
> 
> My problem is that I am not a good touch typeist and some
> mistaken key 
> combination will trigger this bug. Alas I will not have
> been looking at 
> the keyboard when I trigger it:-)
> 
> 
> > -Ken
> >
> > On 02/05/2011 01:11 PM, Walt Smith wrote:
> >> Thanks all who answered.  And those who
> confirmed the problem.
> >> I deleted the offending lines of code pointed out
> by Rajiv
> >> and konqueror works on that site.  One error
> message in some status
> >> bar indicated "source" something something, and I
> had wrongly assumed
> >> the site wasn't being reached.  I never would
> have suspected
> >> the html code itself would have crashed the
> browser.
> > ...
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CALUG mailing list
> > CALUG at unknownlamer.org
> > http://lists.unknownlamer.org/listinfo/calug
> >
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>                
>         Bonnie Dalzell, MA
> mail:5100 Hydes Rd PO Box 60, Hydes,MD,USA
> 21082-0060|EMAIL:bdalzell at qis.net
> Freelance anatomist, vertebrate paleontologist, writer,
> illustrator, dog
> breeder, computer nerd & iconoclast... Borzoi info at
> www.borzois.com.
> HOME www.batw.net    ART
> bdalzellart.batw.net  BUSINESS www.boardingatwedge.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 16:37:16 -0500
> From: "Schmertz, Robert" <rschmrtz at integ.com>
> Subject: Re: [CALUG] (solved) konqueror is funny (crash)
> To: "waltechmail at yahoo.com"
> <waltechmail at yahoo.com>,
>     "calug at unknownlamer.org"   
> <calug at unknownlamer.org>
> Message-ID:
>     <503845D7A6920C4FAB5A65A65606BD6C0A644868 at COL-MAIL01C.Integ.Local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Walt,
> 
> Did you happen to save the original version -- the one that
> caused the crash?  Perhaps the Konqueror folks would
> like it as an example.
> 
> -Bob
> ________________________________________
> From: calug-bounces at unknownlamer.org
> [calug-bounces at unknownlamer.org]
> On Behalf Of Walt Smith [waltechmail at yahoo.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 1:11 PM
> To: calug at unknownlamer.org
> Subject: Re: [CALUG] (solved) konqueror is funny (crash)
> 
> Thanks all who answered.  And those who confirmed the
> problem.
> I deleted the offending lines of code pointed out by Rajiv
> and konqueror works on that site.  One error message
> in some status
> bar indicated "source" something something, and I had
> wrongly assumed
> the site wasn't being reached.  I never would have
> suspected
> the html code itself would have crashed the browser. 
> This morning,
> I realized one troubleshoot method would have been to
> tcpdump
> the request to see that it was properly leaving my box.
> 
> historical note:
> the web page was done by hand well over 10 years ago,
> probably
> closer to 1996.  At one point, I had called it into
> the (very old)
> Mozilla composer and then exited just to see how much
> additional crap
> would be inserted... and I got rid of "most" of the added
> crap.
> Again, that was well over 10 years ago.
> Since then, I've done minor edits.
> 
> Only once in the past has one browser not loaded the page,
> and it didn't crash.  I still don't think konqueror
> should die
> horribly. I routinely use the distros FF 3.5 to do most
> browsing.
> And only recently decided to take another look at
> konqueror.
> 
> I've not aspired to be a web page designer.
> And I admit that all the &nbsp's are mine.
> 
> I would be interested in a solution to cleaning up the
> page.
> I don't know what attributes or composer I could use to
> achieve
> the same "look" result.  What is available in the F12
> distro ?
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Walt........
> 
> 
> --- On Sat, 2/5/11, Rajiv Gunja <opn.src.rocks at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> From: Rajiv Gunja <opn.src.rocks at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [CALUG] konqueror is funny (crash)
> To: jfitz at computer.org
> Cc: "calug at unknownlamer.org"
> <calug at unknownlamer.org>,
> waltechmail at yahoo.com
> Date: Saturday, February 5, 2011, 11:36 AM
> 
> Looking at the code, it is faulty.
> 
> 01. The programmer intended to comment lines 70,71 and 72,
> but failed to do so. Instead, he/she commented out the
> entire code from line 70 to the end.
> 
> 
> Once I commented out those 3 lines (line 70a) <!-- and
> ending with --> (line 72b), the page loaded without
> issues.
> 
> 70a <!--
> 70b <!--P>
> 71  <!--B><!--A HREF="http://www.bcpl.net/help/">BCPL Tech Support
> Pages</A></B>
> 
> 
> 72a <!--p>
> 72b -->
> 
> 02. The programmer is trying to use HTML 4.0, but is not
> following any of its standards. The code starts off with
> Windows HTML editor and has too many of the "&nbsp;",
> which is really bad way to get the text to move to its
> place.
> 
> 
> 
> I recently started writing html/php/JS/ajax code and I know
> how tempting it is to use a WYSIWYG editor, but we end up
> getting so much more junk than we intended.
> 
> Yes, writing CSS or using "tables" is more work for a
> simple text page, but the results are standard and works
> well on all browsers. (except IE, which seems to have its
> own mind).
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Rajiv G Gunja
> 
> 
> Blog: http://ossrocks.blogspot.com
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 22:33, John Fitzpatrick <jfitz2nyc at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> I get the same result with Konqueror on Kubuntu 10.10. When
> going to http://waltech.freeshell.org, Konqueror
> crashes. (Rather quickly, too.)
> 
> 
> 
> "Per aspera ad astra"
> 
> John Fitzpatrick
> 
> jfitz at computer.org
> 
> 410-385-2461
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Fri, 2/4/11, Walt Smith <waltechmail at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > OS is Fedora 12, gnome desktop i686
> 
> > konqueror 4.4.5 is crashing totally and instantly
> 
> > with one known address.
> 
> >
> 
> > however, it *Crashes*  everytime I  do
> 
> > http://waltech.freeshell.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> CALUG mailing list
> 
> CALUG at unknownlamer.org
> 
> http://lists.unknownlamer.org/listinfo/calug
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CALUG mailing list
> CALUG at unknownlamer.org
> http://lists.unknownlamer.org/listinfo/calug
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 16:51:55 -0500
> From: Ken Jackson <linux at kenjackson.us>
> Subject: [CALUG] Browser acid test scores
> To: calug at unknownlamer.org
> Message-ID: <4D4DC67B.9070900 at kenjackson.us>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> 
> I decided to rerun the Acid Test on all my 
> browsers.<http://acid3.acidtests.org/>
> I even reinstalled Epiphany, since Bonnie referenced it.
> 
>    Dillo 
>    v0.8.6  won't run the test
>    Konqueror
> v4.5.5   scored    89/100
>    Firefox   v3.6.13 
> scored    94/100
>    Epiphany  v2.30.6  scored 
>   99/100
>    Opera 
>    v11.01   scored   100/100
> 
> I don't have MS W running at the moment, so I can't run
> it on their browser.
> 
> Go Opera!  Though I still prefer Firefox.
> 
> -Ken
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:30:46 -0500 (EST)
> From: Bonnie Dalzell <bdalzell at qis.net>
> Subject: Re: [CALUG] Browser acid test scores
> To: Ken Jackson <linux at kenjackson.us>
> Cc: calug at unknownlamer.org
> Message-ID:
>     <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102051723160.1932 at localhost6.localdomain6>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> 
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2011, Ken Jackson wrote:
> 
> > I decided to rerun the Acid Test on all my
> > browsers.<http://acid3.acidtests.org/>
> > I even reinstalled Epiphany, since Bonnie referenced
> it.
> >
> >   Dillo 
>    v0.8.6  won't run the test
> >   Konqueror
> v4.5.5   scored    89/100
> >   Firefox   v3.6.13 
> scored    94/100
> >   Epiphany  v2.30.6 
> scored    99/100
> >   Opera 
>    v11.01   scored   100/100
> >
> > I don't have MS W running at the moment, so I can't
> run
> > it on their browser.
> >
> > Go Opera!  Though I still prefer Firefox.
> >
> > -Ken
> 
> I did not know about the acid test website. Thanks for that
> info.
> 
> On my Ubuntu Natty (sortof) install  epiphany 2.30,.2
> got 100/100
> Konqueror 4.5.1 was the same as yours as was Firefox
> 3.6.13
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CALUG mailing list
> > CALUG at unknownlamer.org
> > http://lists.unknownlamer.org/listinfo/calug
> >
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>                
>         Bonnie Dalzell, MA
> mail:5100 Hydes Rd PO Box 60, Hydes,MD,USA
> 21082-0060|EMAIL:bdalzell at qis.net
> Freelance anatomist, vertebrate paleontologist, writer,
> illustrator, dog
> breeder, computer nerd & iconoclast... Borzoi info at
> www.borzois.com.
> HOME www.batw.net    ART
> bdalzellart.batw.net  BUSINESS www.boardingatwedge.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CALUG mailing list
> CALUG at unknownlamer.org
> http://lists.unknownlamer.org/listinfo/calug
> 
> 
> End of CALUG Digest, Vol 50, Issue 5
> ************************************
> 


      




More information about the CALUG mailing list